## Session IV – C: Corporate Finance: Calculating Internal Rate of Return or IRR

*in*Corporate Finance

# Concept Title: Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

Description: Teaches you to calculate the IRR

### Option D

Lower your expected return

We know that we can’t earn 10% per annum for seven years on this investment. What is the rate that we can earn?

There are a number of ways of answering this question:

- If you have access to MS Excel, you can set up the whole investment and run
**Goal Seek**to find the magic number. - If you don’t have access to MS Excel and prefer to do the whole thing by hand, we can try the manual approach ( It pays to know the basics…)

Let’s start with two points. Point A is at 10% interest. Point B is at 0% interest.

0% – 10% is the size of the interval. We lose 588 dollars at Point A (NPV = (588)). We gain 1,000 dollars at Point B (NPV = 1,000).

#### Step One

Reduce the interval to half its size.

Point A is still at 10%. Point B is now at 5%. If we calculate the NPV at 5% we find that it is 41 dollars

#### Step Two

Find the value at the two ends of the new interval. One of them should be above your target value, the other should be below your target value. Repeat Step One till you are close to your target value

Point A is still on the plus side, while point B is still on the negative side. Our target value is NPV of zero.

We again reduce the interval by half. Point B is still at 5% but Point A is now at 7.5%. The NPV at Point A is now (294)

We repeat the process again. Point A is at 7.5%. Point B is now at 6.25%. NPV is (136). We are now at a point where both ends of the interval have a negative NPV. This means that we have overshot our answer and that the solution lies between 6.25 and 5%. Now Point A is at 6.25% and Point B is at 5%.

If we repeat the process a few more times, we will find that a close approximation (NPV = .6) and 5.28% (NPV = -.3). The table below summarizes the above discussion and presents the next few steps

Iteration | Point A | NPV at A | Point B | NPV at B |

1 | 10% | -558 | 0% | 1,000 |

2 | 10% | -558 | 5% | 41 |

3 | 7.5% | -294 | 5% | 41 |

4 | 7.5% | -294 | 6.25% | -136 |

5 | 6.25% | -136 | 5% | 41 |

6 | 5.625% | -50 | 5% | 41 |

7 | 5.3125% | -5 | 5% | 41 |

8 | 5.3125 | -5 | 5.1625% | 17 |

9 | 5.3125 | -5 | 5.234375% | 6.4 |

10 | 5.3125 | -5 | 5.273438% | .6 |

## i. Internal Rate of Return (IRR) and comments

The final result is that over a 7-year period, the above investment allows us to earn an interest rate of 5.27% per annum. This is also known as the Internal Rate of Return or IRR. The IRR for any investment is the rate at which the Net Present Value is equal to zero. That is, the IRR (also known as the adjusted rate of return or true rate of return) is the discount rate at which the discounted cash inflows are exactly equal to the discounted cash outflows.

### Putting it all together

Let’s do two more examples that bring everything together from above.

### Examples

1) Invest 10,000 today

Receive 5,000 one year from today

Receive 2,500 two years from today

Receive 3,000 three years from today

Receive 3,000 four years from today

What is the present value of your investment

PV of Investment = $10,000 ( since you invest %10,000 today, and don’t do any further investments)

First we calculate the discount rates for the 4 years

(1 + 10%) ^ 1 = 1.1

(1 + 10%) ^ 2 = 1.21

(1 + 10%) ^ 3 = 1.33

(1 + 10%) ^ 4 = 1.46

PV of Return = PV of $5000 (1 year from now) + PV of $ 2500 (2 years from now) + PV of $3000 (3 years from now) + PV of $ 3000 ( 4 years from now).

Year | Return Value | Discount Rate | Present Value |

1 | 5000 | 1.1 | 4545 |

2 | 2500 | 1.21 | 2066 |

3 | 3000 | 1.33 | 2255 |

4 | 3000 | 1.46 | 2054 |

Present Value of Return Stream = | 10920 |

Therefore the NPV of your investment = 10920 – 10000 = 920

2) Invest 10,000 today

Invest 10,000 one year from now

Invest 10,000 two years from now

Invest 10,000 three years from now

You earn a return of 10% every year

What is your balance at the end of four years

**Solution**

Year | Investment at Start of year | Investment + Last years Amount | Amount Available at start of year | Interest Earned | Amount at end of year |

Now | 10,000 | 0 | 10,000 | 1000 | 11,000 |

1 | 10,000 | 11,0000 | 21,000 | 2100 | 23,100 |

2 | 10,000 | 23,100 | 33,100 | 3310 | 36,410 |

3 | 10000 | 36,410 | 46,410 | 4641 | 51,051 |

4 | 0 | 51,051 | 51,051 | 5105 | 56,156 |

Therefore, the amount available at the end of year 4 is $ 56,156

**2) **As the CFO of her new bio-tech company, Anita has to decide whether to invest in Project MadMen. The project requires a $1000,000 initial investment followed by $100,000 for the next 2 years, and $20,000 for the 2 years after that. It guarantees a $5,000,000 return in year 6. Her company has a policy to reject any project that has an IRR of less than 25%. Should she invest in or reject this project?

**Solution: **

The IRR is simply the discount rate which makes the NPV of the invesment equal to 0.

Unless you have an application that can do this calculation for you, like MS Excel, the only way to do this is by trail and error which is done here:

[Note: NPV is calculated the same way as done in previous examples. The calculation has not be shown here for purposes of simplicity]Investment Cash Flows

Year | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |

Return | $ (1,000,000) | $ (250,000) | $ (250,000) | $ (20,000) | $ (20,000) | $ – | $ 5,000,000 |

Discount rate | NPV |

10.0000% | $1,359,798.79 |

30.0000% | ($320,461.51) |

25.0000% | ($67,712.00) |

23.0000% | $55,924.16 |

24.0000% | ($7,718.74) |

23.9000% | ($1,522.63) |

23.8000% | $4,710.20 |

23.8750% | $32.13 |

23.8760% | ($30.11) |

23.8755 | $ 1.01 |

Hence the IRR for this project is approx. 23.8755%. Since this is below herr company’s 25% requirement, she should reject this project.

**3) **In the examples above, we had ignored the issue of time value of money for the purpose of simplicity. However, it is now time to return to reality. How would your investment decision change if you had a discount rate of 10%?

We now need to find out the Net Present Value (NPV) of the two cash flows, which is simply the net profit after discounting.

We know that:

Investment 1 Cash Flows:

Year | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |

Return | $ 50 | $ 50 | $ 50 | $ 50 | $ 50 |

Min. Investment req = $ 100.0

Equity = $ 50.0

Debt = $ 50.0

Investment 2 Cash Flows:

Year | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |

Return | $ | $ – | $ – | $ – | $ 125 |

Min. Investment req. = $ 50.0

Equity = $ 50.0

Debt = $ –

Discount rate = 10%

The discount factor for a year can be calculated by

Factor for year n = (1 + [discount rate])^n

*‘^’ stands for “to the power of” *

Hence:

Year | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |

Discount Factor | 1.10 | 1.21 | 1.33 | 1.46 |

Dividing each cash flow with the appropriate discount factor gives us its present value

Investment 1 Cash Flows:

Cash flow in Year | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |

PV | $45.5 | $41.3 | $ 37.6 | $ 34.2 |

Investment 2 Cash Flows:

Year | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |

Return | $ | $ – | $ – | $ – | $ 85.4 |

Adding up these cash flows for each investment and subtracting the initial investment gives us the NPV of the investment.

Therefore:

*NPV of Investment 1 *= 45 + 41 + 38 + 34 – 100 = $ 58.5

*NPV of Investment 2 *= 0 + 0 + 0 + 85 – 50 = $ 35.4

The NPV of Invesment 1 is greater than that of Investment 2. Does that mean that Investment 1 is better? Don’t let the absolute numbers decieve you! You should look at the relative numbers, i.e.

account for the capital invested. The ROIC ratio does this:

Investment 1:

*ROIC *= 58.5 / 100 = 58.5%

*ROE *= 58.5 / 50 = 117.0%

*Payback period = *3 years

Investment 2:

*ROIC *= 35.4 / 50 = 70.8%

*ROE *= 35.4 / 50 = 70.8%

*Payback period = *4 years

Again using **ROIC **as a measure, we can see that investment 2 is a better value that investment 1. However, we see that taking into account a discount rate has decreased the returns on the Investments.

**4) **Another means of comparing invesments is through the Internal Rate of Return (IRR). Using this method, which invesment would you chose?

The IRR is simply the discount rate, which makes the NPV of the invesment equal to 0.Unless you have an application that can do this calculation for you, like MS Excel, the only way to do this is by trail and error which is done here:

Investment 1 Cash Flows:

Year | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |

Return | $ (100) | $ 50 | $ 50 | $ 50 | $ 50 |

Discount rate | NPV |

10% | $58.49 |

40% | ($7.54) |

35% | ($0.15) |

34% | ($1.45) |

34.50% | $0.64 |

34.90% | $0.01 |

34.91% | ($0.01) |

Investment 2 Cash Flows:

Year | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |

Return | $ (50) | $ – | $ – | $ – | $ 125 |

Discount rate | NPV |

10% | $35.38 |

40% | ($17.46) |

25% | ($1.20) |

26% | ($0.41) |

25.50% | $0.39 |

25.75% | $0.01 |

25.74% | $0.01 |

From the IRR calculations, we can see how these investments are on a standalone basis. For example we can see that Investment 1 has an IRR of approximately 34.9%. This means that for any discount rate below 34.9%, Investment 1 has a positive NPV. If we believe that the actual discount rate would be less than 34.9% (which is very high) then Investment 1 might be an investment we are interested in. (The final decision would take into account other investing opportunities, and the required return – to be discussed later.)

Another point of interest: Investment 1 has an IRR of about 34.9% and Investment 2 has an

IRR of approximately 25.75%. It seems that Investment 1 is better that Investment 2!!

So what exactly is going on here? Well the IRR method shows you the sensitivity of the returns to the discount rate. Investment 2 just gives one payment in year 4, while Investment 1 gives a payment every year. Thus the value of Investment 2 falls a lot quicker with the increase in discount rates i.e. it is more sensitive to the discount rate.

We can use IRR to see which investment is better by analyzing where the IRR schedules of these two investments cross each other. One way to do this is to calculate the discount rate that makes the difference between the NPVs of the two investments equal to zero. In order to do this calculation, we need to make sure that we use the same capital base (so that we can compare the NPVs, as discussed in the example above.)

We hence recreate Investment 2 with a base of $100.

Investment 2 Cash Flows:

Year | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |

Return | $ (100) | $ – | $ – | $ – | $ 250 |

Investment 1 Vs Investment 2

Discount rate | NPV |

10.00% | ($12.26) |

20.00% | $8.87 |

15.00% | ($0.19) |

15.50% | $0.84 |

15.10% | $0.02 |

15.09% | ($0.00) |

We see from above that Investment 1 and Investment 2 cross each other at around 15.09%. Thus at any discount rate below this, Investment 2 outdoes Investment 1. The situation is reverse for any discount rate above 15.09%. Hence we can see that in deciding on an investment it is essential to gauge how realistic your assumption of the discount rate is and to analyze the sensitivity of the investment’s NPV to the discount rate. In this case if we believe that the discount rate is most likely between 8% to 12%, Investment 2 would be the investment for us.