Capital Adequacy

The premise behind capital adequacy is that an entity should assess its risks and hold capital that is commensurate with its risk profile and control environment.

In markets and sectors such as financial services where the risk of contagion or domino effect is high Capital Adequacy is used as a primary regulatory tool. Regulators use Capital Adequacy to ensure that new entrants as well as existing players have crossed a minimum threshold of required capital and that the threshold changes based on market conditions as well as balance sheet profile of the institution in question.

While the thinking can be applied to any prudent business, it is enforced specifically for banking,  brokerage and insurance industry under the ambit of Basel II, Basel II, The EU Capital Adequacy Directive (CAD) and the Solvency II regime for insurance industry.

In calculating capital that is required the entity would need to consider all material risks in the business. Usually the level of capital to be held would be above the minimum requirements stated in regulation such as Basel II.






Free Courses

View More >>

Recent Posts

  1. Basel III – Capital Adequacy – US Implementation – Credit Risk Weights for Internal Ratings Based and Advanced Measurement Approaches
  2. The focus on Bank Regulation & Bank Regulators. From Matt Taibbi & Michael Lewis to Senator Warren.
  3. Probability of Shortfall and Expected Shortfall with or without Basel III – Financial Risk Management Training Course – Day Three Update
  4. Stress Testing, ALM, Capital Adequacy online video courses
  5. Basel III Enhancement – Linking liquidity crisis with Liquidity Coverage Ratio and Stable Funding Ratios
  6. Basel III – Liquidity Framework – Metrics for monitoring liquidity risk
  7. Basel III – Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) – The Denominator: Total Net Cash Outflows
  8. Basel III – Liquidity Framework – Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) – The Numerator: Value of Stock of High Quality Liquid Assets
  9. Basel III – Liquidity framework – Introducing the supervisory approach global liquidity ratio standards
  10. Setting Risk Limits: Worst Case Loss versus Most likely loss

View More >>